Rush to complete audit report on time costs Brent Council an extra �50,000
Town hall forced to spend five-figure sum to ensure they hit deadline
Brent Council was charged �50,000 for extra work that needed to be undertaken, leading to its failure to submit its annual audit report on time, it has emerged.
That meant the auditor was required to postpone the completion date due to significant further work that had to be taken out, an annual audit letter to the council showed.
Audit accounts are designed to show the council’s arrangements to achieve value for money in its use of resources.
As a result of the delayed process, Brent Council was handed an ‘amber’ status for the report and had to pay a total cost of more than �560,000 to the auditors.
You may also want to watch:
During the council’s executive meeting on Monday, Councillor Muhammed Butt, lead member for resources and deputy leader of the council, said the council may have let “too many staff go to soon”.
Sarah Cox, speaking on behalf of Brent’s anti cuts campaigning group Brent Fightback, expressed fears about the nature of the extra costs.
- 1 Fury as Brent's planning committees approves 'another high-rise' hotel in Wembley
- 2 Residents anger as fourth gambling casino approved in Willesden street
- 3 Brent gang members convicted of shooting a man in Enfield
- 4 Brent MP order out of Commons after accusing Prime Minister of lying 'over and over again'
- 5 Petition against LTNs in Cricklewood exceeds 1,000 signatures
- 6 Wembley: Fan robbed of watch after Euro 2020 final
- 7 Tokyo Olympics: Brondesbury Park pupils wish swimmer Tom Dean luck
- 8 Brent motorists hit with 2,633 blue badge penalty notices in 2020
- 9 Men from Canning Town and Leytonstone charged with theft from Wembley Stadium
- 10 Teenager's artwork reimagines grandfather's class photo
She said: “The whole atmosphere of cuts and the redundancies that arise contribute to these anomalies that you cannot account for, �50,000 is a substantial amount of money and in the current climate certainly is something that isn’t needed.
“It seems as though it might be that they have let too many people slip and as a result were unable to meet targets.”
The news comes at a time when the council will face a further �8m cut in funding from central government for the coming year.
A spokesman for Brent Council said the council faced ‘significant’ challenges in 2010/2011 and that the amber assessment reflected “some weaknesses” in the application of their internal controls and financial reporting arrangements.
He added: “However, despite these difficulties, with additional work from the council and the auditors, the District Auditor was able to issue an unqualified opinion and Value for Money conclusion. The council is now well placed to deliver its 2011/12 accounts.”