Kingsbury family to face civil action over �10,000 insurance claim
High Court heard claims mother, father and daughter exaggerated car crash injury
AN INSURANCE company has been granted permission to take civil action against a family in relation to a five-figure payout.
Liverpool Victoria (LV=) claim Minaxi Shah, of Lewgars Avenue, Kingsbury, lied about her road crash injuries and put in a grossly inflated �600,000 insurance claim.
The High Court heard yesterday (Tuesday) that LV= are mounting a bid to have the 49-year-old mother, along with her husband Anil and daughter Neha, put behind bars for alleged contempt of court.
Mrs Shah was injured in a rear-end shunt in South London, in 2005, and put in a claim for almost �640,000 damages, not including compensation for her ‘pain, suffering and loss of amenity’.
You may also want to watch:
The insurance company says Mrs Shah settled for �10,000 late last year after being confronted by video footage, secretly shot by inquiry agents in August 2009 and early last year.
LV=’s lawyers claim that Mrs Shah’s 51-year-old husband and 23-year-old daughter backed her up as she ‘lied about the nature, severity and impact’ of her injuries, particularly in relation to her ability to work.
- 1 Wembley bar issued final warning for late nights and Covid 'breach'
- 2 Thirteen arrested following trafficking raids in Kingsbury and Romania
- 3 Neighbours call on council to halt Neasden underpass housing plans
- 4 Petrol crisis: Brawls, long queues and empty stations across Brent
- 5 Kingsbury bar loses alcohol licence for hosting parties during pandemic
- 6 Pensioner slams Brent Council over 'hell' housing
- 7 Two men arrested in connection with Jeffrey Wegby killing
- 8 Brondesbury park woman denies killing Wembley pensioner
- 9 Man admits murdering waiter in Kilburn 38 years ago
- 10 Lib Dem resigns from Brent's budget scrutiny taskforce
Nothing whatever has been proved against the Shahs but top judge, Lord Justice Jackson, has now granted LV= permission to pursue its bid to have them jailed.
Opening the way for LV= to launch its case against the trio, Lord Justice Jackson said the company had ‘a strong prima facie case’ worthy of a full hearing.
Observing that the increasing prevalence of insurance fraud is ‘common knowledge’, the judge said it was not reasonable to expect the Crown Prosecution Service to prosecute every case.
Although emphasising that nothing has been proved against Mrs Shah and her family, the judge concluded: “I am quite satisfied that bringing contempt proceedings against the three respondents is in the public interest”.