Harlesden drug dealer loses appeal bid against Hayes murder conviction
- Credit: Archant
A Harlesden drug dealer who was jailed for life for the machine gun murder of an addict failed in a Court of Appeal bid to clear his name.
Anthony Small, 34, of High Street, Harlesden, gunned down Anthony Dickson with a Mac-10 in Hayes because the 33-year-old had stolen drugs from one of his runners.
Small, who ran a supply racket in Hayes and Uxbridge, lured him to a park and blasted him on Christmas Eve 2010.
He was convicted and jailed for life in November 2011.
Earlier this month, he took his case before three senior judges at the Court of Appeal in a bid to clear his name.
You may also want to watch:
Lord Justice Davis reserved judgment, but returned to court this week to dismiss Small’s appeal and condemn him to serve his punishment.
The court heard Mr Dickson had stolen drugs and a small amount of cash from one of Small’s dealers on December 8, 2010.
- 1 Mass vaccination centre opens in Wembley Park
- 2 Wembley drug dealer jailed for biting, scratching and pushing police
- 3 Man arrested in connection with Neasden murder and two stabbings
- 4 Third stabbing in Neasden as murder investigation under way
- 5 Fundraiser launched after beloved mum found collapsed in Barham Park dies
- 6 Wembley grandmother who survived Covid thanks live-in carer
- 7 Disabled Wembley cyclist calls for more inclusivity on Brent's roads
- 8 Tributes paid to Queen's Park charity worker who died after contracting Covid
- 9 Wembley tutor takes to Instagram to help with homeschooling
- 10 Pensioner dies after crashing into a wall in Kenton
Prosecutors alleged that his death was a planned execution.
At his appeal, Small’s barrister, Bernard Tetlow QC, criticised the admission at the trial of material which was said to be “hearsay”.
He said the evidence was “extremely damaging”, as it purported to give Small a motive for the killing and the trial judge, Judge John Bevan QC, had been wrong not to have instructed the jury to consider a charge of manslaughter as an alternative.
Giving judgment, Lord Justice Davis, who heard the appeal with Mr Justice Stuart-Smith and Judge Martyn Zeidman QC, rejected the arguments.
The prosecution case was based on a “firm foundation” of mobile phone data, with a “very significant amount” of other evidence supporting it.
“The jury had the opportunity to assess Small’s own evidence on all of the issues.
“We see no reason to conclude that the conviction was unsafe.”